A quick YouTube search:

The Week Before -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5iAn-8l7W8

Sonnet 138 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCtuP41Y5xM

"When copies are super abundant, stuff which can't be copied becomes scarce and valuable."

Doesn't a statement like that sort of claim that DRM is a good thing? I mean, the entire idea of DRM is to make things non-copyable. Similarly, a statement like that could help support the institution of laws that prevent fair-use copying and derivative works, thus "adding value" to those works.

I understand the though behind this statement, but it seems flawed on some level to me.