I'm waiting for a gay porn studio to notice this and get an idea for a new project. "We'll put them in labcoats! It'll be hot!"

@CapnMarrrrk: it's OK, I forgive you. Cecil Whitaker's does a better job on the local style than Imo's, though I'll still take the Blackthorn over the local style any day.

There are also a lot more articles on Wikipedia than on Conservapedia (~2.1M vs ~45K), so the clickbots don't have to work as hard to disrupt the stats.

Also, Wikipedia has an informal policy that discourages friends of gays from editing:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Friends_of_gays_should_not_be_allowed_to_edit_articles
This likely drives friends of gays elsewhere.

Looks more like Lenin in a coonskin cap to me. Or John Malkovich from the end of "Being John Malkovich", when he has long hair and is blathering about puppetry.

That image is based on data from October 2006, when the English Wikipedia only had around 1.4M articles. We're almost to two million now (per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics).

[In these counts, the term "article" excludes redirects; pages outside the article namespace (like Talk: or User: pages); blanked articles; and articles without internal wikilinks.]