Have they thought about putting turbines at the bottom of these "art" waterfalls so that in addition to using electricity to power them, they could create enough power to run themselves and more?
seems like a waste if they don't at least try to use them in a more positive way than just tourism.

and i'm curious about how this will effect the ecology of the river as well, since it disrupts everything not to mention the added expected waste additional tourist would create??

and how would that affect the integrity of the bridge?

do these "artists" even think about that kind of stuff?

it sounds pretty useless to me, certainly a big waste of money and resources, but what do i know?