"Morpheus, why do my eyes hurt?"

"Because you've never used them, Neo."

"Ignorance is bliss" - Cipher.

KINGOFCATS must surely understand
the 83/17 rule applies to groups of
sufficient size...(see James Merrill's
Changing Light At Sandover for
more on this cosmic ratio)

Those who comment on BB definitely constitute
a representative sample of the human universe.

Thus, 87 of 100 BB commenters are no different than the "it's our ranch, it's our home" homespun hotties.

They merely have a different fantasy ranch to
claim as home.

Not meant as putdown to the commenters, just an
observation that for most people, reality is a
construct, and if these polygamists "creep you out" perhaps it's because they are real.

Read Paul Graham's site for much more on this area of investment.

There's a lot of essays about this topic as he is the founder of Y-combinator.

To those who think the WSJ is the NR...try using grey matter.

An example of the difference would be the series of WSJ articles and editorial comments regarding the "black box" of Enron in the years leading up to the disaster.

Enron didn't surprise me because I read WSJ.

If you want to know what is happening in the real world where information is money, then the WSJ is required reading, no matter what political persuasion sways you.