No no my friends.. for my money you can't beat Ms. New Booty: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgx4HvI8e18

Although some hard core gangsta rap could be better..

#5 (I understand Mr. Sklar was with Disney when these company lines were invented, and even involved in coming up with them.)

I rather doubt Walt had a top 10 list for designing his park. It would be more like a list of 1000 anyway. This sounds like something Disney marketing came up with. Or maybe an Imagineer wrote it, so it would look like he was working. Sorry, the new Disney has me a little cynical.

Those Pinball 2000 games sucked compared to real pinball. They did nothing to enhance the gameplay, they downgraded the gameplay in the name of fancy new graphics - sound like any movies you know of?

The physical aspect IS the fun of pinball. They should have capitalized on that. I think pinball has a big advantage over video games, because home console technology has exceeded arcade game technology, but pinball is one thing the average person will never have in their homes. When I go in a mini-arcade or bar, I look to the pinball games for entertainment, not the video games. Video games I can play at home.

Marty Sklar is a hack, reciting the company line. Noone creative remains at Disney. They are all efficiency experts.

Why is it NASA can't even figure out how to properly make a website? Using this crud instead of a simple link:

javascript:openNASAWindow('http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/selene/index_e.html')

Wealthy landowners should not have to put up with a human being infestation, any more that you would tolerate a roach infestation in your own home. It is the wealthy who suffer when lawbreakers like this woman are glorified. Respect capitalism.

The above was full of shit, in case you liked it.

Lucas already has the winning formula for keeping people from pirating his movies - make sure they suck ass.

HuffPo & BoingBoing are 2 of my 5 read-every-day links. HuffPo may be biased and employ douches, but they have a fantastic format and they filter for entertaining and smart stories.

I don't see anything wrong with this.

And Linux may be free, but its hell to use.

I haven't been able to find the server the last few days.. any idea why?

Sweet. Note everyone, sort by server name, then its easy to find under B.

#38 posted by realyst: Why not use something like Truecrypt's 'plausible deniability' mode?

Another vote for TrueCrypt here, a fantastic program. The plausible deniability concept is pure genius. They want a password? Give them a password. They want to see your files? Let them go to town.

How sad though, that the price of freedom is our integrity. Just remember, a promise made under duress is not binding.

"to dismiss DW offhand (nowadays) is silly...back when it did produce some really crappy code. DW8.x started to fix a lot of those issues and DW9.x is getting even better."

Wow, it's only 10% crappy code now? Sign me up!

Seriously people, WYSIWYG tools - even if one did exist that made good code - are SLOWER than hand coding in the long run. This is because an experienced coder creates self-documenting code designed for easy maintenance. From the names of variables/classes/id's to a flexible structure that can easily be modified to fit potential design changes, hand coding is superior for all but the simplest projects. And even for those, I would only recommend WYSIWYG for people who will not be doing this for a living, like my grandma.

Ever tried to make manual modifications to something generated by a WYSIWYG? Try it someday, you will wish you were never born.

Obviously Mac vs PC is a retarded point to bring into this discussion.

Umm how is this different than any other major website? Is there ANY major site that doesn't hand-code their html? If any of them got caught using Frontpage or Dreamweaver I think they would be laughed out of town. This is like saying Valve wrote Half-Life from scratch, instead of using GameMaker.

I believe this was a casualty of 9/11, when the tourism dropped so did the need for all those rooms.

"Many people don't realize that this is exactly what causes a lot of old newsreels and silent footage to have that speeded up look: it was filmed at 16 fps. The equipment used to show it now usually can't do 16, so it plays at 24 fps,"

48fps is evenly divisible by 16fps, so those old newsreels would again be viewable at normal speed, without the jerkiness caused by a 16fps->24fps conversion.