The point is that one would expect the moderators of a site that makes such a vocal stand against censorship to have a light rather than a heavy touch when it comes to deleting posts, which is not what I was seeing. And I'm not talking about myself, since nothing of mine was deleted, but about general principles.

Attachment may lead to suffering, but purging ideas leads to tyranny - and the ideas don't have to be world-shaking to be of value to the people who expressed them. People are upset, I think, because they feel they've been treated unfairly and disrespectfully, and I'm not sure I disagree with them. That seems worthy of discussion.

Could someone explain acceptable parameters for discussion of this particular post so I can have one that lasts more than five minutes? Certainly other people's seem to be vanishing like sugar under Ms. Hayden's vigorous censorship teaspoon...