I'm going to have to agree with the person that said Lennon destroyed her career, and not the other way around. Instead of being known as an artist of worth, she'll always be John's wife. I don't think she minds though. The truth is, the Beatles more or less died (as a functional unit) once their manager committed suicide/accidentally overdosed. Although the music continued to be excellent, the band itself went downhill after that.

Bah, I watched the video a couple of times and I don't think it's real. Without wanting to get too graphic [warning], I'm pretty sure the woman was "stuffed" and then told to push it out. Then a different cup of "stuffing" was given to the women for them to eat. It's still gross, but not the real deal.

I mean, think about it. Given that the producers were so intent on shocking people, they wouldn't have cut between the "pushing out" and the eating if they didn't have to. Why would they do that?

To get an idea of what I mean, compare 2G1C (if you're willing to see it) to the final scene in John Waters' cult hit, Pink Flamingos. There's no cut in John's shot, which is what makes it so shocking and revolting.

Amazingly, if you have never seen Pink Flamingos before, you can see the final scene on Youtube - lol.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOMrslEMp94

I think what people here aren't realizing is just how difficult it is to give away that kind of money. Sure one could do a lot of good with 33 billion, but where does one start? How does one ensure that the money donated is being used appropriately or effectively? How do you know who to trust/hire? Is what you're giving money to ethical? The list goes on and on.

Think about it, Bill Gates had to quit his day job in order to give his money away. It's actually a full time endeavor for him (and his wife!) -- and at 85 years old, I doubt Mr. Kamprad has the energy to do the same.

Personally, while I wouldn't say no to it, having 33 billion in the bank must be one of hell of a burden. All I can see is stress!