"C.A. is written in such a poor manner that general public can´t tell if it´s true or not (because it is unbearable to read)." Ideas are not clear, opinions are not referenced, and contrasting points are not properly presented. Therefore, it clearly does not merit the award what ever their political agenda might be.

A few hours left in this...

BTW, the politico pseudo science denialists are really hammering the voting now, apparently making a thing out of getting on top. It is a shame as Bad Astronomy, the blog right behind the junk science C.A., really, really deserves the win.

Also, as commented above, online polls are often bunk, and it seems likely the poll is being gamed, beyond the obvious neo-con crap-flood.