CycloneHog

Comment Threads

• cndc commented on Media Matters: O'Reilly falsely claimed he only "reported what groups" were calling Tiller
  @23 not to nitpick but it would be libel, not slander and defamation more broadly. Unfortunately O'Reilly's speech is almost certainly protected by the First Amendment (which doesn't make it any more palatable). See the Brandenburg case. MediaMatters rules....
• Yamara commented on Media Matters: O'Reilly falsely claimed he only "reported what groups" were calling Tiller
  O'Reilly just does as he's told. Not that he doesn't enjoy himself. Extremist Christian terrorists even have presidential candidates scared to cross them: How mainstream are "pro-life" extremists? And oh look, there's even a manual for anti-choicers on how to lie to everyone else: JUST BE NORMAL AGAIN It's like Bill O'Reilly: The Home Game!...
• ablestmage commented on Media Matters: O'Reilly falsely claimed he only "reported what groups" were calling Tiller
  I don't see how Bill could possibly be inserted somehow into the murder case. Inspiration is impossible to discern -- because at the same time, it could just as easily inspire someone instead to defy Bill's preaching and promote abortion. In order for slander and libel charges to even be considered, the statements must be proven false. If Tiller is not a baby killer, then there is a case. If Tiller is a baby killer, then slander and libel charges cannot be brought. The article posted here to BB seems to be dancing around the real issue: the article doesn't...
• thequickbrownfox commented on Media Matters: O'Reilly falsely claimed he only "reported what groups" were calling Tiller
  Bill has also broadcast a photo of Markos (Daily Kos) on Fox, for some reason I cannot fathom. http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/markosoreilly.JPG...
• dainel commented on Media Matters: O'Reilly falsely claimed he only "reported what groups" were calling Tiller
  OK, Bill lied, defamed, and made Dr Tiller out to be someone he is not. He convinced this guy that he is an evil man who should be killed. Now the killer knows that he had be had. Bill got him to kill a nice guy. I think he should go get Bill next. If the killer reads this, and goes and gets Bill, am I guilty for inciting him?...